Friday, 19 May 2017

Syria, Russia condemn US-led strike on pro-Assad forces

The US-led coalition said the convoy's advance posed a threat to allied forces 
Syria and its Russian ally have condemned a deadly US-led coalition air raid against pro-Syrian government forces in a desert area near the country's border with Jordan and Iraq.
Coalition fighter jets on Thursday struck a convoy of militiamen advancing inside a protected "deconfliction zone" north-west of the southern town of At Tanf, the military alliance said in a statement.
Syrians' suffering persists after returning to former ISIL-held town
The US, which is leading an air campaign in Syria targeting groups such as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as ISIS), said the convoy's advance had posed a threat to US and US-backed Syrian rebel forces in the area.
"This brazen attack by the so-called international coalition exposes the falseness of its claims to be fighting terrorism," a Syrian military source told state media on Friday, confirming that the bombing had killed "a number of people" and caused material damage.
Russia, which launched its own air campaign in September 2015 in support of Syria's President Bashar al-Assad, called the strike "a breach of Syrian sovereignty".
"Such actions that were carried out against the Syrian armed forces ... [are] completely unacceptable," Gennady Gatilov, Russia's deputy foreign minister, was quoted as saying by state-run RIA Novosti on Friday.
A member of the US-backed Syrian rebel forces told the Reuters news agency that the convoy comprised Syrian and Iranian-backed militias and was headed towards the Tanf base,  where US special forces operate and train Free Syrian Army rebels.
Rami Abdel Rahman, head of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR), said at least eight people had been killed in the attack.
"Most of the killed belong to militias loyal to the Syrian regime and are not Syrians," he told the DPA news agency.
SOHR, a UK-based monitor tracking developments in Syria's long-running conflict via a network of contacts on the ground, also said that four military vehicles carrying pro-government forces and their allies were destroyed in the strike.

The fight for a living wage in the UK

Picturehouse workers have been building a campaign to demand staff be paid the living wage 
Brighton, UK - On a grey Saturday in March, about 40 protesters walked out of their jobs at the Duke Cinema in the British seaside resort of Brighton. It felt more like a celebration than an industrial action as the banner-carrying protesters crowded the pavement in front of the cinema.
Workers from London branches of Picturehouse, the chain of which the Duke is a part, travelled to Brighton to join the action, chanting slogans and ferrying coffee to their colleagues on the picket line.
The walkout was a milestone for employees of Britain's major arthouse cinema chain, but this was just the beginning; a tough fight lay ahead.
For the past three years, Picturehouse workers have been building a campaign to demand that staff be paid the living wage.
At £9.75 ($12.63) an hour in London, £8.45 ($10.95) in the rest of the UK, it is an hourly rate that is above the government-fixed minimum wage and calculated to be the minimum amount employees need to live comfortably. It is not a legal requirement, but more than 3,000 employers in the UK have pledged to pay it to their workers.
UK retailers accused of shunning local staff
The Picturehouse chain, which is owned by multinational corporation Cineworld, isn't one of them.
Nia Hughes, who works for the Ritzy Cinema, in Brixton, south London, is one of the employees who thinks this is unacceptable.
"I don't think any workers should be living under the poverty line," she told Al Jazeera at the Brixton strike, adding that the fact that the chain has expanded and increased its revenue, makes its refusal especially unsettling.
The staff at Picturehouse say the tight budgets imposed by their current wages of £9.05 ($11.72) an hour affect every aspect of their lives.
"You can just about get by on what you're given and that can mean working long hours," says John Karley, a London Picturehouse employee. "It feels precarious, and it's very stressful."

High living costs

High rents and living costs, particularly in London, mean that low wages can have serious implications. The living wage calculation, which is assessed by the Resolution Foundation think-tank, takes into account basic expenditure on food and essentials as well as rent, bills, travel and childcare.
For many workers at Picturehouse cinemas across London, the high cost of rent is what makes it so hard to live on their salaries
And a growing number of people are having to get by on low wages.
"We've got record levels of people in employment, but the sorts of work people have been moving into are not well-paid jobs," explains Mubin Haq, director of policy at Trust for London, a non-profit group that focuses on reducing poverty and inequality in the capital. "And as well as wages being squeezed you also see costs increasing. So people get this double whammy."
For many workers at Picturehouse cinemas across London, the city's high rents are the toughest squeeze. Statistics from the Mayor of London show that almost all areas in inner London have room rents of more than £130 ($168) a week.
In Brixton, where the Ritzy cinema workers went on strike, the average rent for one room in a shared property is estimated at £686 ($888) a month. On a living wage salary this means that around half an employee's take-home pay would be spent on rent.
This doesn't only affect cinema workers. In February, cleaners employed by universities and hospitals in London went to strike over conditions and wages.
"One of the frustrations for us is people not getting reasonable hours," says Karley, explaining that it’s common for workers to be employed on zero-hours contracts. This means they aren't guaranteed a set number of hours, and could find themselves working fewer, or even no hours.
Since 2008 the number of people in London on part-time or temporary contracts has risen from 25 percent to 29 percent.
Those on strike have also raised the issue of the widening gap between an average worker and top company executives. According to the independent media union BECTU, Cineworld chief executive Mooky Griedinger was paid £1.2 million ($1.5 million) in 2015, the equivalent of £575 ($744) an hour.
Wage disparity has been widening steadily since the 1970s, explains Haq. "We've been told for years that this is about performance-related pay and attracting talent," he says, adding that this argument has been countered by research into low-performing companies with high-earning chief executives.
"But if London really wants to be an attractive place to work it need to keep the wages up, to the living wage at least."

Rising poverty

According to a recent study about 13.5 million people in the UK - or 21 percent of the population - are classified as poor, a category defined as living on 60 percent of the nation's median household income after housing costs are deducted. Yet of this number, 55 percent have at least one member of the household in work.
In Brighton, staff feel that the strike is part of a bigger protest movement that is addressing these problems."[The campaign is] very much part of the bigger picture," says one employee who did not want to be named.
The Ritzy branch of Picture house offers a blueprint for the campaign.
The Ritzy branch of Picturehouse, which in 2013 became the first cinema chain to strike, offers a blueprint for the campaign that lies ahead.
Hughes has been part of strike action at the Ritzy since the beginning when staff there unionised with BECTU and began a campaign that saw them walk out of work 13 times in the course of a few months.
Eventually the Ritzy staff secured a 26 percent pay rise that brought their salaries to £9.10 ($11.8) - close, but not quite equal to the living wage.
That is still more, however, than the £6-£8 ($7.7-$10.3) an hour that other staff at Cineworld are paid, according to salary and employer review network, Glassdoor.
"I think that it was pretty groundbreaking for modern striking," Hughes says of the first year of the campaign. At the time the campaign attracted significant attention, with a "carnivalesque" atmosphere, branding that riffed on movie tropes, and support from high-profile figures in film and TV.
"We didn't want to just have a picket line with people handing out forms," Hughes says. "We wanted to modernise striking, I guess. We understood that what we were striking for appealed to all workers, and especially those at the lower paid end of the scale."
Now, the momentum of that campaign is spreading. In the past six months, the Picturehouse branch in Hackney, north London, began strike action for the living wage, followed by branches in Crouch End, in central London, and Dulwich. The Brighton walk-out marked the strike's jump from a London-based protest to a nationwide campaign.
For the Picturehouse brand, the attention drummed up by the strike could already be a concern, especially as strikers are now calling for a boycott of the chain until demands are met.
At its Hackney branch, large orange posters advertising the pay rates of workers are the first things customers now see when they walk in.

Christie Grant from Hill & Knowlton Strategies, the PR agency that represents Cineworld, told Al Jazeera: "This is an issue for Picturehouse and its management team and we hope that the dispute will be resolved as quickly as possible." 
A representative of Picturehouse declined a request for an interview, but referred Al Jazeera to a statement on the company website stating that the company's pay rates are among the highest in the industry and above the minimum wage, and that increases in pay outstripped inflation rates.

Collective bargaining unit 

The Picturehouse website states that staff are paid £8.72 ($11.30) an hour outside London and £9.65 ($12.50) in the capital, based on 7.5 hours worked in an 8-hour shift. Staff point out that when a mandatory half hour break is incorporated this works out at £9.05 ($11.73) an hour. 
"We have operated a policy of raising the pay rates of front of house cinema teams and cleaning staff at a different proportion to the rest of the company, in order to slim the differentials between the top and the bottom wages paid," the statement says. "Working together for a profitable business enables us to create more jobs, share more in pay and provide a return to shareholders."
Picturehouse's statement adds that almost all staff are represented by the Forum, a collective-bargaining unit set up by the cinema itself.
But frustrated at a lack of progress in negotiations with the Forum, the strikers have joined BECTU, and want the cinema chain to recognise it. Despite having recognised BECTU representation at the Ritzy in an earlier agreement, Picturehouse is yet to meet this demand.
"I became very disillusioned with how limited the Forum really was," says Karley, who has been working with Picturehouse for 10 years. "You feel there's so many limitations in what you can do ... For the company I think it's very much a way of stopping the staff from having any independent representation."

Iranians head to the polls for presidential vote

Iranians were headed to the polls on Friday for the first presidential election since the landmark 2015 nuclear agreement, in a vote that could have serious implications for the future of the country and its relationship with the West.
President Hassan Rouhani, a moderate, was seeking a second term as he Face off  against Ebrahim Raisi, the frontrunner among the conservative set.
The position of president is the second most powerful in Iran after the Supreme Leader, who is commander-in-chief and controls the Guardian Council. The May 19 vote will be the first stage, with a possible runoff vote if none of the candidates wins a simple majority of 50 percent +1 of the votes.
All voting is to be concluded before the start of the holy month of Ramadan.

US slaps sanctions on Venezuela Supreme Court judges

Venezuela's Supreme Court, led by Moreno, assumed the powers of congress in March 
The United state has imposed sanctions on Venezuela's chief judge and seven other members of the country's Supreme Court as punishment for seizing powers from the opposition-led congress earlier this year.
Those sanctioned will have their assets frozen within US jurisdiction, and US citizens will be barred from doing business with them, the US treasury department said on Thursday.
The new sanctions package was aimed at stepping up pressure on supporters of President Nicolas Maduro amid growing international concern over a Crackdown on mass street protests.
"The Venezuelan people are suffering from a collapsing economy brought about by their government's mismanagement and corruption," Steven Mnuchin, the US treasury secretary, said in a statement.
"Members of the country's Supreme Court of Justice have exacerbated the situation by consistently interfering with the legislative branch's authority," he said.

Trump Saudi visit forecast to burnish his image with Muslims

© Nicholas Kamm, AFP | US President Donald Trump and Saudi Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman speak to the media in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC, on March 14, 2017.
Latest update : 2017-05-19

President Donald Trump may be embroiled in accusations of wrongdoing in the United States, but none of that is likely to colour his visit to Saudi Arabia on Friday, where he is expected to be greeted with warmth and praise.

The trip, Trump’s first international tour, includes stops in Saudi ArabiaIsrael, the Palestinian Territories, Italy and Belgium. The President’s weekend in the desert kingdom will centre around three main events: a Saudi-US summit, a Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)-US summit and an Arab Islamic American Summit, which is to be attended by leaders of the world’s Islamic nations.
While in the kingdom, Trump is scheduled to give a speech on radical Islam and, in keeping with his own predilections, participate in a Twitter forum with young people.
Several of his hosts, the Saudis among them, are invested in making the trip a triumph. They see Trump as an ally because of his vociferous opposition to the Iranian government, which the Saudis see as a destabilising force in the region. Relations between the kingdom and the US had frayed toward the end of President Barack Obama’s tenure.
While President Obama had strayed from longstanding US alliances in the Middle East, Trump has “signaled a return to a traditional view, which is that there are good powers and bad powers in the region,” said Bernard Haykel, professor of Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University.
In that view, Saudi Arabia and Israel are in the good column. Iran is in the bad.
A foregone conclusion
The success of Trump’s trip has not been left to chance. Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States have already negotiated, or are in the final stages of negotiating, accords with the United States that are expected to be announced during Trump’s visit. Among them is a series of arms deals with the kingdom worth more than $100 billion. That number could rise as high as $300 billion over the next decade, a senior White House official told Reuters on condition of anonymity.
The arms deal highlights a welcome reversal of policy for the Saudis. Last year the Obama administration halted some weapon sales to the Kingdom because of its deadly military operation in Yemen. The Trump administration scrapped that decision in March.
Trump and Saudi officials are also expected to announce a package of Saudi investment in US infrastructure. And Trump is expected to lay out his vision for a Gulf State-backed NATO-style defense force for the Middle East.
“The Saudis are basically trying to present Trump with win-win situations,” Haykel said.
Trump will hold bilateral meetings with leaders of the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states, some of whom he has already encountered. On Monday he hosted Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed at the White House. The two governments recently concluded a defense cooperation agreement, and the State Department last week approved a $2 billion sale of arms to the UAE.
Tackling radical Islam
The President’s speech on radical Islam will coincide with the opening of a centre in Riyadh dedicated to promoting moderate Islam. The address will be “inspiring but direct” and will highlight the need to confront radical ideology, National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster said.
The speech is intended, in part, to signal that the President has moved away from the inflammatory language he used about Muslims during his campaign and his repeated assertions that Saudi Arabia was behind the attacks on 9/11.
“The gesture in choosing Saudi Arabia as his first country [to visit as president] is a refreshing pivot from the campaign rhetoric,” said Fatima Baeshen, a director at the Arabia Foundation in Washington, D.C. “It’s symbolic to the global Muslim community, given that Saudi Arabia is home to two holy sites in Islam.”
A two-way street
The trip has benefits for the Saudis as well. The weekend will include a Saudi-US CEO forum on Saturday, and several investment deals are expected to be inked as part of the Vision 2030 social and economic reform initiative the Kingdom unveiled last year. Saudi Arabia will also issue new licenses allowing US companies to operate there.
The trip won’t all be talk of business and terror. Over the weekend, American country singer Toby Keith will give a concert in Riyadh. The event is free—but open to men only.
Trump narrowly avoided a sticky moment at the summit of Arab leaders. Early in the week, Sudan’s foreign minister told reporters in Geneva that his nation’s president, Omar al-Bashir, would attend the forum of Arab leaders. The International Criminal Court has issued a warrant for war crimes against Bashir, and the idea that an American president would attend an event with an accused war criminal outraged former US officials and human rights activists.
But Trump dodged that bullet.

Japan cabinet approves Emperor Akihito abdication bill

If Akihito is allowed to abdicate, it would be the first time a Japanese emperor has stepped down since 1817 
Japanese government has approved a one-off bill that allows ageing Emperor Akihito to step down from the Chrysanthemum Throne in what would be the first such abdication in two centuries.
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's cabinet signed off on the legislation on Friday, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga told reporters.
The bill will now be sent to parliament, where it is expected to pass. 
Reports of the 83-year-old Akihito's desire to retire surprised Japan when they emerged July 2016.
"When the emperor first hinted that we might think about his abdication, most people were shocked because we were not prepared to hear that, but now many Japanese people support his idea," Yoshiki Mine, president of Institute for Peaceful Diplomacy in Tokyo, told Al Jazeera. 
Akihito, who has had heart surgery and prostate cancer treatment, said in rare public remarks last year he feared age might make it hard for him to fulfil his duties.
But current Japanese law has no provision for abdication, thus requiring politicians to craft legislation to make it possible.
The bill is one-off legislation that would allow only Akihito to step down, with no provisions for future emperors, but Mine said he believed it could serve as a sort of precendent 
It also makes no reference to the controversial issue of changing the system to allow women to inherit the throne, or to stay in the imperial family upon marriage, Japanese media said, although political parties are discussing a separate resolution on the topic.
"The bill is a certain kind of compromise between the more orthodox and conservative thinkings and the awareness of the new situation," Mine said.

Tuesday, 16 May 2017

Why are journalists being killed in Mexico that much?

 Mexico is not a war zone but yet it is one of the most dangerous places in the world for reporters.  Recently  journalist Javier Valdez is the latest of several members of the media who have been killed this year alone.  The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) says widespread impunity "allows criminal gangs, corrupt officials, and cartels to silence their critics".  The Mexican government repeatedly promised to protect journalists, and freedom of speech but the shootings and beatings continue. So, what should be done to stop the targeting of journalists?  Presenter: Sami Zeidan  Guests:  David Shirk - Associate Professor of Political Science and International Relations at the University of San Diego  Miguel Basanez - Former Mexican Ambassador to the US  Steven Dudley - The Co-director of InSight, an initiative aimed at monitoring organised crime in the Americas

man who tried to climb Everest has been arrested in Kathmandu

Ryan Sean Davy training ahead of his Everest adventure   
man who tried to climb Everest has been arrested in Kathmandu
Nepalese friend of Ryan Sean Davy said the climber was being questioned by tourism officials and is due to appear in court on Wednesday where he is expected to receive a heavy fine.
"He is in good heart although worried about his finances and the scale of the punishment he will receive because has no cash, which is why he mostly travelled on foot."
Mr Davy, US-based South African, 43, he said he climbed alone to a height of 7,300m (24,000ft) before he was found hiding in a cave by  the officials who also confiscated his passport because he did not have a permit to climb Everest.

He has apologised but also he complained of being treated harshly by the officials. It is extremely rare for someone to attempt climbing Everest by themselves.
he said "I have no idea of the outcome regarding my Everest no-permit climb," Mr Davy posted on Facebook on Tuesday

Kenyan pupils protest after Nairobi school demolished

Pupils of Kenyatta Golf Course Academy, Nairobi block Mbagathi Road with their desks after their school was demolished.Image copyright
Image captionThe demonstration ended peacefully
Primary schoolchildren have used their desks to block a major road in Kenya's capital Nairobi after their school was demolished.
The Kenyatta Golf Course Academy was knocked down at the weekend following a land dispute.
They were joined by their parents and teachers as they chanted: "We want our school, we need to study in school."
Several Kenyan schools have been demolished in recent years because of arguments over title deeds.
In some cases, corrupt officials have issued multiple deeds for the same property.
One parent protesting during the rush-hour said: "We are demonstrating because we did not have any notice to vacate."
Teachers are reported to be concerned that the demolition means they have lost their jobs.
The demonstration ended peacefully.
Two years ago police fired teargas to disperse protesting schoolchildren in Nairobi after their playground was sold to a developer.